Operator reliability index
How reliably each charging network publishes live status to drivers. Scores use live-status share, feed uptime and a stale-status penalty — never the feed name.
This ranking is published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Please credit LiveChargeMap. CC BY 4.0 · Download as CSV
· recalculated daily
| Rank | Operator | Charge points | Score | Live status share | Feed uptime (30 days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,401 | Christoph Kollenda | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,402 | Christoph Müllejans | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,403 | Christoph Müller | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,404 | Christoph Müller-Jenne | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,405 | Christoph Obel | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,406 | Christoph Pleyer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,407 | Christoph Schiedermeier | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,408 | Christoph Schmelter | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,409 | Christoph Schmidt | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,410 | Christoph Schwartze | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,411 | Christoph Seifert | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,412 | Christoph Settmacher | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,413 | Christoph Siekmann Elektrotechnik | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,414 | Christoph Stark | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,415 | Christoph Steinberger | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,416 | Christoph Stryczek | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,417 | Christoph Thürey | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,418 | Christoph Veldboer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,419 | Christoph Wallner | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,420 | Christoph Weis | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,421 | Christoph Weiß | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,422 | Christoph Wilcke | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,423 | Christoph Wilhelm | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,424 | Christoph Ziebell | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,425 | Christopher Flaig | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,426 | Christopher Martin | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,427 | Christopher Mühlbach | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,428 | Cindy Buse | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,429 | Cindy Koch | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,430 | Cirino Magnano | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,431 | CityCube Projektgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,432 | Clara Marie Sievers | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,433 | Classic Center Sande GmbH & Co. KG | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,434 | Claudia Griese | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,435 | Claudia Keller | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,436 | Claudia Kunz | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,437 | Claudia Nickl | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,438 | Claudia Ullmann | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,439 | Claudius Weiland | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,440 | Claus Brendelberger | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,441 | Claus Peter Dunkel | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,442 | Claus Peter Spiegel | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,443 | Claus Püschke | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,444 | Clemens Bröddemann | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,445 | Clemens Dietzsch | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,446 | Coler GmbH & Co. KG | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,447 | Comforthaus Witte GmbH | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,448 | ConAct Ventures GmbH | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,449 | Corlex GmbH | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,450 | Cornelia Asmus | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,451 | Cornelia Schulze PV, Einzelunternehmen | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,452 | Cornelia Timme | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,453 | Cosima Thiele | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,454 | Crossmade GmbH & Co. KG | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,455 | Cybele AV Studios (Einzelunternehmen) | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,456 | Czogalla | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,457 | DBF Solutions GmbH | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,458 | DECIBEL audio BKS GmbH | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,459 | DELTA Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,460 | DIWA-Finanz.de | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,461 | DRIES-CONSULTING UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,462 | DSPTA Photovoltaik Aschersleben Einzelunternehmen | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,463 | Dachdeckerei Frühauf | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,464 | Daniel Rath | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,465 | Daniel Auer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,466 | Daniel Beisel | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,467 | Daniel Benkert | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,468 | Daniel Bergmann | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,469 | Daniel Beyer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,470 | Daniel Biller | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,471 | Daniel Boss | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,472 | Daniel Dubinin | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,473 | Daniel Esau | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,474 | Daniel Gläser | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,475 | Daniel Groh | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,476 | Daniel Gutzer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,477 | Daniel Henning | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,478 | Daniel Hofmann | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,479 | Daniel Hudak | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,480 | Daniel Igers | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,481 | Daniel Jonietz | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,482 | Daniel Jung | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,483 | Daniel Kaiser | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,484 | Daniel Kasten | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,485 | Daniel Kohrs | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,486 | Daniel Kopp | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,487 | Daniel Koza | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,488 | Daniel Kremser | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,489 | Daniel Käfer-Schipschak | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,490 | Daniel Mancini | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,491 | Daniel Merins | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,492 | Daniel Mittendorf | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,493 | Daniel Müller | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,494 | Daniel Pechmann | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,495 | Daniel Pintar | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,496 | Daniel Pirzer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,497 | Daniel Pätzold | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,498 | Daniel Rauhöft | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,499 | Daniel Reinhard | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
| 10,500 | Daniel Schaffer | 1 | 45 | 0% | 86% |
14,066 operators are rated; the CSV download lists all of them.
How the score is calculated
For each operator with a live-capable feed, the daily score is
clamp(0, 100, round(100 × (0.50 × live_share + 0.40 × feed_uptime + 0.10 × (1 − stale_share))))
- Live status share — share of charge points with a fresh status (available, in use or out of service, reported within the freshness window), as on the statistics page. Stale reports do not count.
- Feed uptime — over the last 30 days, the share of finished scheduled sync runs that succeeded for the feeds that carry this operator’s stations. We never name the feed.
- Not-stale share — one minus the share of charge points whose status is older than the freshness window.
- Every operator with a live feed is rated, however small: the figures count all of its charge points, not a sample. Operators with only static register data and no live feed are shown as not rated on their data-quality page and omitted from this ranking.